A UNITED States military appeals court has denied an effort by Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin to throw out possible plea deals for the alleged mastermind of the attacks on September 11, 2001, and his two co-conspirators.
The deals could see the three men — Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi — plead guilty to the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people. In exchange, they would be spared the possibility of the death penalty.
A plea hearing for Mohammed, who is accused of orchestrating the killings, is set for next week.
The New York Times and Associated Press both reported on Monday night that the military appeals court had ruled against Austin.
The decision upheld a previous judgement from a military judge, Colonel Matthew McCall, who ruled that Austin lacked the standing to throw out the plea bargains following their initial approval.
News of the possible plea deals emerged several months ago. They signalled a possible off-ramp for a case long complicated by the use of torture on prisoners swept up during the so-called “global war on terror”, launched by the US in the wake of the September 11 attacks.
Legal experts have said that the use of torture — dubbed “enhanced interrogation” by the administration of former President George W Bush — could prolong or prevent a conviction.
For instance, revelations that Majid Khan, a former al-Qaeda courier, had been tortured at a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) black site prompted public outcry. The CIA denied the allegations, but Khan’s lawyers described him suffering sexual abuse, starvation and waterboarding.
In 2021, a military jury, composed of eight officers, sentenced Khan to 26 years in prison, the shortest sentence possible. But seven of the eight members on the panel urged the government to offer clemency, given the nature of Khan’s torture.
Like Khan and other September 11 defendants, Mohammed and the two other defendants are being tried by a special military commission set up under World War II-era laws that allow for the prosecution of foreign defendants outside of the US justice system.
While a Pentagon appointee had initially signed off on the plea deals, Austin sought to revoke the agreements in August amid pressure from lawmakers and family members of victims, who deemed the deals too lax.
Austin later said he believed Americans deserved the opportunity to see the trials through.
Defence lawyers, however, charged that Austin’s push to revoke the plea deals represented unlawful interference in the case.
Despite Monday’s decision, Austin can still appeal the case to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which could cause further delays.
