NIGERIA spent $1.19bn in foreign exchange on food imports in the first half of 2026, representing an increase of $121.52m, or 11.41 per cent, from the $1.07bn recorded in the corresponding period of 2025.
News Point Nigeria reports that the increase occurred despite the Federal Government’s efforts to boost local food production, according to an analysis of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) Quarterly Statistical Bulletin for the second quarter of 2026, which showed sustained demand for foreign exchange to finance food imports.
Read also: Nigeria Records Third Consecutive Inflation Decline As Rate Falls To 14.63%
A breakdown of the figures showed that foreign exchange utilisation for food imports stood at $232.05m in January 2026, up from $213.11m in the corresponding month of 2025, representing an increase of 8.89 per cent.
However, spending declined by 22.90 per cent to $150.87m in February from $195.68m a year earlier, before recovering to $153.73m in March, compared with $141.30m recorded in March 2025.
The sharpest increase occurred in April, when foreign exchange spending on food imports surged by 54.28 per cent to $217.74m from $141.13m in the corresponding period of the previous year.
In May, foreign exchange utilisation rose by 8.59 per cent to $220.26m from $202.83m, while June recorded a 23.92 per cent increase to $212m from $171.08m.
Further analysis showed that spending on food import-related foreign exchange increased in five of the six months under review, with February recording the only year-on-year decline.
On a quarterly basis, the amount spent on food imports declined by 2.57 per cent, from $550.79m in the first quarter of 2025 to $536.65m in the corresponding period of 2026.
However, the trend reversed in the second quarter, with spending rising by 26.38 per cent from $514.34m to $650m.
This indicates that the increase recorded in the first half of 2026 was driven by higher foreign exchange utilisation between April and June, which more than offset the decline recorded in the preceding quarter.
Read also: How To Check If Your Phone Is Approved For Use In Nigeria
The development comes as the Federal Government continues to pursue agricultural policies aimed at expanding domestic food production and reducing dependence on imported commodities.
The President of the Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria, Femi Egbesola, recently explained that insecurity and low technological adoption in agriculture were among the major reasons Nigeria continued to rely on food imports.
Egbesola said, “Most of the farmers are no longer on the farms because of insecurity. Many farmlands have been deserted. That is where the primary products come from. It is when the farmers plant and harvest. That is when the manufacturers and other users can buy from them and use them as their inputs. This time, many of the farms are deserted.”
He noted that Nigeria’s agricultural productivity remained well below global standards because of the continued use of outdated tools and farming practices.
The business leader urged the government to integrate technology into farming, upgrade equipment available to smallholder farmers and invest in agricultural mechanisation to close the production gap.
The Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, had earlier warned that Nigeria’s decision to open its market to food imports, including rice from Thailand, wiped out local rice mills and left banks grappling with bad loans arising from investments in the agricultural value chain.
He said that although the policy helped lower food prices following the removal of the petrol subsidy, it undermined domestic production and threatened long-term food security.
The emir urged the government to support poor households without exposing local farmers and businesses to overwhelming competition from imported food products.
Sanusi spoke at the Sustainable Table Series held at the Federal Palace Hotel, Victoria Island, Lagos, on Saturday, where he highlighted the need for governments to prioritise nutrition, education, infrastructure and productive investment to improve economic development.
He argued that making food affordable for poor households should not come at the expense of domestic production, adding that the government could support vulnerable citizens without exposing local farmers and agricultural businesses to overwhelming competition from imports.
